
I think it's time to talk about money. Because often in order to achieve something very significant for us in the spiritual and the physical plane, we do not have several hundred elementary.
The amount of money more than others, in Soviet society was considered not respectable. I'm talking about those circles in which she was educated as doctors, teachers, engineers. People with cars, houses have always perceived negatively. In our society, "morality" of people and their moral qualities of the material was assessed by the state and the amount of money. A rich, means scoundrel. Correct me if I'm wrong.
I remember the statements of this kind: "Where did he get the money? Yes, stole." In other words: "corrupt" ...
The desire of people to live better materially, I'm not talking about ways not welcomed by the Soviet state. Everyone should be like. Stand was not accepted and even ashamed.
I think that is why in most people educated under the Soviet system is not adequate to do with money and to methods of making them. Because then our work is not paid on results and quality. She paid the same for all. This is politics, I do not want to get into the wilderness, though I have arguments on this topic. I say this because in my view, our attitude towards money, as well as many other things, lies in education.
What does an adequate attitude to money? It is to be considered as a means to the goal. Money - is the "bricks" for building the future. As a pen to write or a computer to store and convey to humanity.
In a civilized society a talented world-famous inventor, who, with his brains could provide a decent life, not only themselves but all our future generations should not live on a pension of two-room apartment. I was just about Kalashnikov.
What is a decent life? Correct me if my ideas about it do not coincide with yours. This live in a comfortable and spacious house to each family member had his own personal space where he can calmly think, work and play. To this same house was a place for the whole family. The main thing that would ease housing coincided with the needs. A man must be mobile, have a comfortable and nice clothes (always nice for a pleasant sense of self). He should be able to take care of your physical and mental health and be able to do his favorite thing.
The salary of the Soviet teacher could not have a decent life. And I even thought not to occur, which may be different.
Only after leaving home, I began to see examples of a decent life. And the most interesting thing that did not have to maintain it to steal or take bribes.
Of course, that immigrants are always hard to adjust to new conditions. I am no exception. In the end, it all somehow arranged. I got a job. Decent enough job, people are not bad, even thoughtful. But somehow, over time, when the euphoria (after all, a skilled job, a computer powerful, graphics, Internet access, a comfortable chair, air conditioning) had the feeling that you are using.
Have you been feeling?
Used in a large, require undue stress, regardless of your personal time and health, insist on the responsibilities that are not yours or not is yours. By and large, you vobschem something and not know until the end of their duties. Not because you are not sufficiently addressed on the post. Because leadership is not interested and did not clearly define them profitable. I'm not doing research, what is that: directly from a company where I worked with a local or mentality, or even the capitalist system of society.
I worried: "Why, I feel that I use, that my work is not sufficiently appreciated and paid accordingly," Compared to my job counselors, teacher, psychologist, when I just lived to work, gave her all his time and energy there is a specific opening hours, sometimes a little more, sometimes less ... Why do I feel that I use?
And I realized - changed my attitude toward money have changed needs, a sense of reality - an adequate perception of the world - it became clear that it is important and what is in the background. Changed understanding of the value of time and energy costs.
Then, when I gave the work a lot of time and effort, it is essentially paid not in money. SmeshnoJ Because what we have received on the day of "pay" and money is hard to call. This is so as not to "die of hunger and cold." It was something else. I will leave the arguments about it next time. I think it has more to do with age and experience. The question of psychology.
Working on "someone" you rashoduesh his time, and thus his life on "someone." This "someone" is not your favorite, not your child, not your parent, friend ... you're not "wasting their lives" to a stranger. You say, "Well, not for free as ..." No, no ... but for everybody for a very cheap ...
I think that my, your life is much more expensive than the salary that we get over the fact that "spend their lives" to "someone".
The idea is not new, but when I thought that I was almost 40 ... and during that time I did not do for themselves, to leave future generations ...
Was sad.
Where's the ring? "Grandmother" or even "prababushkino" which will devolve, in the female line in my family. And looking at him, my children will remember me. I was just figuratively, but there was something in it ...
We need to work on yourself!
The correct idea, and most importantly a "fresh." I know myself fairly sarcastic. Question arises, what to do? How? Where to start? What I can do to me getting paid for it? Where to get tools and knowledge to begin with?
Perhaps to some questions I can answer. The main thing I know for myself, to be sure of success. To do this, and am a section on self-improvement .
So, try to decide what I am willing to pay.
- For a product that you can eat, drink, wear, ride it, sit, lie, etc.
- For the knowledge of child development, for services for a pleasant and interesting time spending
And you? What are you willing to pay? I think we are not much different ...
If there is something else, add to my list.
See you there! Your Tori



If earlier, during the Soviet era evoked more feelings of envy, but now more and more such people have a sense of respect.
Refine, Vladimir, what do you mean by "these people" ...